Future Farmers of America (FFA) Parliamentary Procedure Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

Which of the following is an illegal main motion?

A motion that has already been discussed

A main motion that has already been discussed is considered illegal because parliamentary procedure adheres to the principle of not revisiting a topic that has already been decided, unless certain conditions are met. Once a motion has been debated and voted on, it effectively closes that chapter for the current session. A motion can only be brought back for discussion if there is new information or if a member votes to reconsider it, which requires specific procedural steps.

The other options present motions that, under typical parliamentary rules, would be legal. For instance, a motion to support community projects is legitimate and can help a group align their efforts with community needs. A motion seeking majority approval fits into the framework of decision-making within parliamentary procedure, as it follows the standard voting method. Additionally, a motion that requires a discussion period is consistent with parliamentary principles that allow for thorough deliberation on substantive topics, thus making it a permissible action.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

A motion to support community projects

A motion that seeks majority approval

A motion that requires a discussion period

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy